LLM Ranking Tool

Which AI model should you actually use? Score 26 current models against your workload: weight the capabilities that matter, set your token mix and budget, and compare the finalists side by side. Free, no signup, updated as the field moves.

data as of 2026-07-10 Methodology

Edit the dataset

The full model list as JSON. Change scores, fix stale prices, or add a model. benches holds raw benchmark results, overrides pins a 0 to 100 dimension score directly, and est lists dimensions to flag as estimates. Applied changes persist in this browser only.

How the LLM Ranking Tool Works

Every model gets a 0 to 100 score on 11 dimensions grouped into reasoning and knowledge, coding and agents, writing and instructions, context and vision, and speed and cost. Your weights set how much each dimension matters, and the composite is the weighted average: score = sum(weight x dimension) / sum(weights). The stacked bar on each row shows how many points each dimension group contributes, so you can see why a model ranks where it does.

Where the dimension scores come from

Quality dimensions are normalized from public benchmark results: SWE-bench Pro and Verified and Terminal-Bench 2.x for coding and agents, GPQA Diamond and the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v4.1 for reasoning, FrontierMath Tier 4 for math, MMLU-Pro and SimpleQA Verified for knowledge, IFBench for instruction following, MRCR for long context, MMMU for vision, and LMArena Elo for writing. Each benchmark maps a floor to 0 and a near-frontier ceiling to 100, then the dimension averages its available benchmarks. Labs stopped publishing many classic benchmarks in 2026, so where nothing verifiable exists the dataset pins an editor estimate flagged with a tilde (~). You can inspect every raw number by expanding a row, and you can override anything with the Edit data button.

Cost and speed

Cost uses a blended price per million tokens under your token mix: (in x input price + out x output price) / (in + out). Use cases differ in shape. Retrieval-augmented generation reads far more than it writes (12:1), while drafting writes more than it reads (1:2), and that changes which model is cheapest for you. Prices map $60 per million to 0 and $0.10 per million to 100 on a log scale. Speed maps 10 tokens per second to 0 and 400 to 100, also log scale. Prices are standard pay-as-you-go rates without batch or cache discounts.

Honest caveats

  • Benchmarks are gameable and partially contaminated. Treat small score gaps as noise.
  • Terminal-Bench values mix versions 2.0 and 2.1 depending on the source, and LMArena Elo comes from mirror snapshots that disagree by 10 to 15 points.
  • Speed is output tokens per second and varies by host. Time to first token on reasoning models includes thinking time and can run minutes on hard tasks.
  • Reasoning models bill their thinking as output tokens, so real per-task cost runs higher than per-token prices suggest.
The dataset refreshes automatically every week from provider pricing pages, Artificial Analysis, and published benchmark tables, and the "data as of" chip above shows the last refresh. Numbers drift fast in this field: verify pricing on the provider's page before you commit an architecture to it.

Picking the model is step one. Shipping it is the real project.

Naper Solutions designs and builds AI features for real businesses: model selection, API integration, retrieval pipelines, automations, and the custom software around them. Based in Naperville and serving Chicago and beyond. Explore our AI and machine learning services, or tell us what you are trying to build and get straight answers.

Talk to Us About AI Integration
Call Contact